Questions? (800) 525-8873 | M-F 8am-6pm EST

CMI Classic Stainless Steel Pulley up to 5/8in diameter rope

CMI Classic Stainless Steel Pulley up to 5/8in diameter rope
Item #: 15216
$65.95
Stainless Steel Plates

Availability: In Stock

OR

100% Satisfaction Guarantee
Price Match Guarantee

Description

Details

Stainless steel pulley with 2.37 aluminum sheave.For ropes up to 5/8" 12 oz. weight. 8500 lbs. tensile.
Additional Information

Additional Information

Weight 0.75 lb.
Brand CMI
Color Silver
Height 4.5"
Material Stainless Steel
Meets ANSI Standards Yes
Sheave Diameter 2.4"
Tensile Strength 8,500 lbs ( 37.8 kN )
Working Load Limit 850 lbs ( 3.7 kN )
MPN RP104
UPC Code 000194354354
Reviews

Customer Reviews

very useful Review by manuel cascane
Quality
Value
Price
i love this pulley is very useful and i carry always in my saddle i build a lot of rigging systems with it . (Posted on 8/2/2014)
Not bad Review by Nick Lamoureux
Quality
Value
Price
I have used this pulley while it belonged to other people and loved it. I purchased and also loved it! It is very lightweight and takes all the friction out of the lowering system. Now for the bad: the particular pulley I purchased had a faulty bushing which caused it to fail after 3 weeks. It did not "break", the pulley wheel just stopped turning all of a sudden. Sherrill was kind enough to take back my product and repair it (since I had only used the pulley for 3 weeks before it broke). I believe they just replaced the bushing and the pulley wheel itself, but it took just over a month to get the pulley back to me after I sent it out for repairs. It works fine now. I really like this pulley a lot, but I think next time I will try purchasing the Heavy Duty Stainless Steel Pulley (which has double the mbs - 16,000 lbs). The heavy duty pulley is only $6 more and uses bearings rather than a bushing. While this pulley worked it worked very well, and is an 'essential' tool for any arborist. I use mine on a carabiner and a strap of webbing and I have not had any issues other than the first initial failure. (Posted on 1/21/2014)