|
|
|
|
(Go Back)Professional Arborist vs the Mutilator
|
Professional arborists have a duty to protect the profession. Unfortunately, under-trained novices can downgrade our attempts to improve the appreciation of proper tree care and treatment.
There's already a Web site solely opposed to tree topping, one of the most obvious examples of the work of "mutilators." Check out PlantAmnesty.org.
But how can you address the issue when customers demand mutilating solutions?
A lot of times, bad arborist decisions are the result of human control issues.
People plant the wrong trees for the wrong space. Or they just don't like the nature of some trees...acorns, leaves and branches are considered a "mess" by some so they demand control through poor pruning that often doesn't serve the purpose and can actually destroy the tree.
There are occasions when removing a tree is a more "humane" approach to "problem trees." But a little education for your customers can go a long way. Explain that topping actually causes the need for more expense later. Explain that removing branches is like removing the "grocery store" for tree nutrition.
Help customers understand that trees last longer when you help them the way nature helps itself. Assure them that often times, the less the better. A good arborist can facilitate natural solutions and elevate the value of our work.
To find a qualified arborist in your area visit this link on the International Society of Arboriculture's website and search by name or location.
http://www.isa-arbor.com/findarborist/findarborist.aspx |
|
|
|
|